The Law Offices of Jeff Peterson
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Securities Law
    • Corporate Transactional Law
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
TEXAS OIL COMPANY PAYS $5.4 MILLION
Jeff Peterson

UBS ANNOUNCES HONG KONG SECURITIES REGULATORS INVESTIGATING ITS WORK ON IPOS

October 30, 2016/in News /by Jeff Peterson

We posted earlier this month about the China Securities Regulatory Commission investigating several IPOs as part of its regulatory push in the area. (http://lawofficesjtp.com/chinese-securities-regulator-announces-ipo-investigations-on-six-companies/)

Report Discrepancy

Now, there’s news this week that Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission is investigating UBS’s conduct in sponsoring IPOs. UBS made the announcement in its most recent quarterly earnings report. UBS announced that the Commission gave notice it would take action against the company and certain unnamed employees for their work in sponsoring IPOs.

In the filing, UBS announced that possible penalties for the alleged violations include fines, a restitution order or suspension from providing corporate financial advisory services in Hong Kong.

Hong Kong has strengthened its securities laws in the past few years by making banks that conduct due diligence and prepare IPO documentation subject to potential liability for misrepresentations and material omissions in offering documents.

Jeff Petersen is a securities attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of regulatory investigations and enforcement matters. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.583.7488.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/iStock-1177061244-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-30 14:03:002022-02-10 10:43:44UBS ANNOUNCES HONG KONG SECURITIES REGULATORS INVESTIGATING ITS WORK ON IPOS
OIL & GAS WIDESPREAD SECURITIES FRAUD
Jeff Peterson

SEC RESPONDS TO SAN DIEGO INVESTMENT ADVISER RAYMOND LUCIA’S PETITION FOR REHEARING ON CLAIM SEC IN-HOUSE COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

October 26, 2016/in Corporate Transactional Law, News /by Jeff Peterson

San Diego-based investment adviser Raymond Lucia’s request that the court consider his challenge to the constitutionality of the SEC’s use of in-house courts was recently rejected by a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Misleading Claims

Lucia, a well-known investment adviser with a long career, was charged by the SEC with conducting misleading investment seminars that promoted a “buckets of money” investing strategy that was purportedly supported by empirical testing, when no such reliable testing had been done. The SEC proceeding resulted in what Lucia’s own attorneys described as a “career-ending lifetime industry bar”.

Lucia petitioned the Circuit Court for rehearing, contending the SEC’s selection of administrative law judges violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, and that the Circuit panel erred in finding that the Appointments Clause did not apply because SEC ALJ’s are not “inferior officers” under the Constitution. The SEC has now responded to the petition.

Decision of the SEC Stands

In its response, the SEC stressed that the panel correctly found that ALJ’s are not inferior officers because those ALJ’s cannot exercise final decision-making authority under the pertinent regulatory scheme. Specifically, the SEC addressed Lucia’s reliance on Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U.S. 868 (1991), with the SEC arguing that Lucia misconstrues the import of that decision. The SEC asserted that, because the tax court judge in the Freytag case had final decision-making authority, the commentary by the Supreme Court in the case Lucia’s counsel relied on in the petition was immaterial; the decisive point of difference is that the tax court judge was an inferior officer due to its final decision-making authority, and an ALJ, without any such authority, is not.

We will update this matter when the D.C. Circuit Court rules.

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of SEC investigations and SEC enforcement matters. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.583.7488.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/iStock-1179923359-scaled.jpg 1441 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-26 15:24:002022-02-10 10:44:03SEC RESPONDS TO SAN DIEGO INVESTMENT ADVISER RAYMOND LUCIA’S PETITION FOR REHEARING ON CLAIM SEC IN-HOUSE COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
CHINESE SECURITIES REGULATOR
Jeff Peterson

INVESTMENT ADVISER PLEADS GUILTY TO INSIDER TRADING

October 26, 2016/in News /by Jeff Peterson

The U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York announced today that David Hobson, who served as an investment adviser in the Providence, Rhode Island, offices of two different national broker-dealer and investment advisers, pled guilty to engaging in a scheme to commit insider trading on deals involving pharmaceutical company Pfizer.

Breach of Duty

Per the release by the U.S. Attorney, Hobson participated in a scheme with his friend Michael Maciocio, who worked at Pfizer. Maciocio, while employed by Pfizer, regularly possessed material, nonpublic information about pending acquisitions and transactions under consideration. The U.S. Attorney asserted that over a period of several years, Maciocio breached his duty of confidentiality by providing inside information about potential acquisitions and transactions to Hobson. The indictment alleged that Hobson would then use this inside information to execute trades in favor of Maciocio, Hobson and other clients of Hobson.

Protecting the Fair Marketplace

In the press release, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated: “As he admitted today, David Hobson exploited inside information provided by his friend and client Michael Maciocio to reap illegal profits for both of them. With Maciocio’s earlier guilty plea, both participants in this illegal insider trading scheme have now admitted to their crimes. Insider trading rigs the markets, and through prosecutions like this, we seek to make the securities markets fair.”

The U.S. Attorney stated in the release that as a result of the scheme, Hobson obtained more than $350,000 in ill-gotten gains for himself, Maciocio, and other clients of Hobson.

Per the release, Hobson pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and to one count of securities fraud, while. Maciocio previously pled guilty on May 20, 2016, to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and two counts of securities fraud.

The case is U.S. v. Hobson, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 16-cr-351

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of SEC investigations and SEC enforcement actions. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.450.4584.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/iStock-950796472-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-26 13:43:002022-02-10 10:44:03INVESTMENT ADVISER PLEADS GUILTY TO INSIDER TRADING
IPO INVESTIGATIONS ON SIX COMPANIES
Jeff Peterson

OPENING ARGUMENTS BEGIN IN SEC CASE AGAINST PARTRIARCH’S LYNN TILTON

October 25, 2016/in News /by Jeff Peterson

Lawyers for the SEC argued yesterday that Patriarch Partners’ Lynn Tilton cheated investors in failing companies of more than $200 million and should be permanently banned from the industry.

Action Against Tilton

The SEC asserted that Tilton and her firm improperly collected the money in fees and other payments for over 10 years without disclosing to investors that companies were defaulting on loans the investors had made to the failing companies attempting turnarounds.

The SEC claimed this conduct was a clear breach of fiduciary duty, and that had investors known the material facts, they would not have invested with Patriarch.

The SEC is seeking in the action, among other things, disgorgement of the $200 million Tilton and her companies received in fees and other payments, a permanent ban on Tilton from the industry and monetary penalties against Tilton and her companies.

Tilton’s Rebuttal to Action

Tilton’s attorneys argued that there was no logic behind the SEC’s asserted fraud case, since Tilton was already worth $1 billion at the time and had no motivation to deceive any investors. Moreover, her attorneys claimed she put nearly half a billion dollars of her own money into the companies and investment funds during the financial crisis, which cuts against any argument she was seeking to dupe investors out of money.

Tilton’s counsel also emphasized the broad discretion Tilton and her companies had to revive the failing companies, stating that this also cut against any claim that investors were deceived about the state of the companies.

Tilton released a statement Monday before trial, stating, “For years now, I have been fighting for truth and justice, and I’m glad that we have reached the point where we can finally put the SEC’s case on trial.” She further said in the statement: “I’ve never fit the mold of Wall Street and the private equity industry, and it appears that this has made me a target. But I believe that ultimately the truth will prevail.”

The trial is expected to take several weeks. We will keep you updated on its progress.

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of SEC investigations and SEC enforcement actions. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.450.4584.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/iStock-902112924-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-25 15:35:002022-02-10 10:44:03OPENING ARGUMENTS BEGIN IN SEC CASE AGAINST PARTRIARCH’S LYNN TILTON
SECURITIES REGULATOR
Jeff Peterson

HONG KONG EXCHANGE TO INSTITUTE VOLATILITY CONTROL MECHANISM FOR DERIVATIVES MARKET

October 25, 2016/in News /by Jeff Peterson

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), which operates stock and futures markets in Hong Kong, announced a plan to institute a Volatility Control Mechanism (VCM) designed to prevent extreme price volatility for its derivatives market in November of 2016. The institution of this mechanism follows the HKEX’s adoption of a VCM for the securities market in August of this year.

How Does the VCM Work?

The VCM consists of several measures, including the triggering of a cooling-off period of 5 minutes when there is an attempt to trade a contract covered by the VCM at a price more than 5 per cent away the reference price (the price of the last, or most recent trade, 5 minutes ago), subject to certain exceptions. Trading of the contract can continue within the cooling off period but within a band.

Roger Lee, HKEX’s Head of Markets, said in the announcement that “[t]he cooling-off period in the VCM mechanism alerts the market, provides a short time window allowing market participants to reassess their strategies and positions, and helps re-establish an orderly market at times when there is abrupt and drastic price movement for the contract concerned.”

Safeguard Against Volatility

Lee stated that the VCM is not intended to limit price fluctuations in normal market conditions but instead to safeguard the market from extreme price volatility arising from major trading incidents, and it is expected to be employed sparingly.

The HKEX announcement can be found at the following link:

http://www.hkex.com.hk/eng/newsconsul/hkexnews/2016/161024news.htm

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of securities matters. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.583.7488.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/iStock-1298240610-scaled.jpg 1440 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-25 15:30:002022-02-10 10:44:03HONG KONG EXCHANGE TO INSTITUTE VOLATILITY CONTROL MECHANISM FOR DERIVATIVES MARKET
CHINESE SECURITIES
Jeff Peterson

CHAIR OF SEC DELIVERS SPEECH ON NEED FOR GREATER REGULATION OF THE U.S. TREASURY MARKET

October 25, 2016/in News /by Jeff Peterson

Mary Jo White, chair of the SEC, discussed the need for increased regulatory oversight of U.S. Treasury trading in a speech at the Evolving Structure of the U.S. Treasury Market Conference at the New York Federal Reserve Board yesterday.

Data Collection to Begin on the Trading Market

In the speech, White detailed the rule proposed by FINRA in July of this year which would require its members, by June of 2017, to report transactions in U.S. Treasury securities through FINRA’s TRACE system, generally by the end of the day on which they were executed. The trading data would not be publicly distributed, but would instead be used to enhance regulators’ oversight of the trading market.

White also addressed the recent announcement this past Friday by the Federal Reserve Board that it intends to collect U.S. Treasury securities transaction data from banks, with the possibility that FINRA may act as agent on the Board’s behalf for such collection. By doing so, transactions by both broker-dealers and bank-dealers will be reported for a fuller collection of relevant data, which White favors to increase regulators’ ability to oversee the market.

Needs of the Treasurey to Avoid Violations

White also spoke on the need to increase regulatory oversight and impose regulatory standards for intermediaries in the Treasury market, stating that there was a lack of critical standard compliance in the area that was present for equity trading platforms, namely Regulation SCI and Regulation ATS.

She then went on to assert a need to ensure potential dealers in treasury securities were registering as such. She pointed to a Joint Staff Report which she said made important observations concerning the nature and characteristics of the trading activity of the 10 most active principal trading firms.  She stated that the observations in the report suggested a course of conduct by firms that constituted traditional dealing activity – being engaged in the business of buying and selling securities for its own account.

The issue was whether firms were registering dealers as required, which would lead the firms to be subject to a regulatory regime requiring, among other things, net capital requirements ensuring the maintenance of sufficient liquid assets, examination of books and records, and specific anti-manipulation and anti-fraud provisions that went beyond the general restrictions imposed on all market participants.

Convergence of Equities and U.S. Treasury

White stated the she had asked SEC staff to consider clarifying how the conduct of these principal trading firms may trigger dealer registration requirements in the U.S. Treasury securities markets.  White argued that it was time for a regulatory convergence across equities and U.S. Treasury securities markets here, so that a firm engaged in the business of buying and selling securities for its own account should be registered as a dealer, whatever type of securities it deals in.

It is clear that regulators intend to make a push to greatly increase regulatory oversight of the Treasury market. We will keep you apprised of future developments in this area.

White’s speech can be found at the following link:

https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/white-keynote-us-treasury-market-conference-102416.html

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing a wide variety of securities industry companies and professionals with regard to compliance and registration requirements. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.583.7488.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/iStock-1205347111-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-25 15:17:002022-02-10 10:44:03CHAIR OF SEC DELIVERS SPEECH ON NEED FOR GREATER REGULATION OF THE U.S. TREASURY MARKET
SECURITIES REGULATOR
Jeff Peterson

CHINESE SECURITIES REGULATOR ANNOUNCES IPO INVESTIGATIONS ON SIX COMPANIES

October 24, 2016/in Corporate Transactional Law, News /by Jeff Peterson

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) released a statement Friday on its investigation into six companies over alleged securities violations pertaining to initial public offerings and disclosures.

CSRC Cracks Down on Fraud

The six companies are Guangdong Guangzhou Daily Media Co., Ingenious Ene-Carbon New Materials Co., Infotmic Co., P2P Financial Information Service Co. and Shenzhen Ecobeauty Co and Longbao Ginseng & Antler Co. (which has applied for a listing and is not yet public). These six are the first cases announced following the start of a CSRC crackdown on IPO fraud.

The alleged violations in the six cases include false representations in IPO prospectuses and misrepresentations regarding revenue and net income. The CSRC also announced it was pursuing certain third parties involved in the transactions, including underwriters, auditors and lawyers.

The CSRC has assembled an investigative team to look into potential securities violations, and it appears this is only the first round in a push for greater compliance with securities laws.

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of SEC investigations and SEC enforcement actions. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.450.4584.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/iStock-1271384332-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-24 14:59:002022-02-10 10:44:03CHINESE SECURITIES REGULATOR ANNOUNCES IPO INVESTIGATIONS ON SIX COMPANIES
INSIDER TRADING PHIL MICKELSON
Jeff Peterson

TECHNOLOGY COMPANY AGREES TO $2.5 MILLION FINE WITH SEC OVER ACCOUNTING VIOLATIONS

October 24, 2016/in Corporate Transactional Law, News /by Jeff Peterson

The SEC just announced that a Houston technology solutions company agreed to pay a $2.5 million penalty to settle charges that it overstated profits, as well as that two former executives of the company agreed to settle charges of causing the violations.

Pressure to Perform Results In Fraud

The SEC’s order stated that after being pressured to improve the financial performance of the energy infrastructure segment of FMC Technologies, the segment’s controller Jeffrey Favret and business unit controller Steven Croft improperly reduced the value of a liability the company recorded for paid employee time off. The SEC alleged the improper adjustments overstated the company’s pre-tax operating profits by $800,000 and enabled the segment to meet its internal company target. The SEC charged that Favret and Croft also corrected a $730,000 error recorded in 2012 that increased the segment’s operating results, but later signed management representation letters attesting there had been no out-of-period adjustments larger than $250,000 for that period.

The SEC’s order also stated that Croft failed to comply with internal accounting controls when directing his business unit switch to a new accounting system without taking reasonable steps to ensure that errors would not occur.  Errors did occur which served to overstate the segment’s results in two quarterly periods.

Findings Unchallenged as Penalties Levied

FMC Technologies, Favret, and Croft consented to the SEC’s order without admitting or denying the findings.  In addition to the company penalty, Favret agreed to pay a $30,000 penalty and Croft agreed to pay a $10,000 penalty.  Favret and Croft, who are no longer with FMC Technologies, also agreed to be suspended from appearing or practicing before the SEC as accountants. The order permits them to apply for reinstatement after two years.

The SEC’s press release can be found at the following link:

https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-221.html

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of SEC investigations and SEC enforcement actions. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.450.4584.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/iStock-1090431444-scaled.jpg 1280 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-24 14:44:002022-02-10 10:44:03TECHNOLOGY COMPANY AGREES TO $2.5 MILLION FINE WITH SEC OVER ACCOUNTING VIOLATIONS
Securities
Jeff Peterson

SEC CHARGES ATTORNEY WITH USING BOARD ACCESS TO ENGAGE IN INSIDER TRADING

October 24, 2016/in News /by Jeff Peterson

The SEC charged a Tennessee lawyer with insider trading, alleging he used his position on the executive committee of the board of directors at Nashville-based Pinnacle Financial Partners to trade on nonpublic information he learned about an impending merger.

Insider Trading Breach

The SEC alleged that James C. Cope wrongfully obtained more than $56,000 by purchasing securities in Pinnacle’s acquisition target, Avenue Financial Holdings, prior to the banks’ joint public announcement of the merger.  The SEC’s complaint states that Cope learned confidential details about the planned merger during a board executive committee meeting and placed his first order to purchase Avenue Financial stock while that meeting was still taking place, and proceeded to place four more orders within an hour of the meeting’s end.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Tennessee filed a parallel criminal case against Cope as well.

The SEC’s press release can be found at the following link:

https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-222.html

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed to practice in California and Illinois who represents clients in a wide variety of SEC investigations and SEC enforcement proceedings. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.583.7488.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/manda-lawyer-san-diego.jpg 1244 2408 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-24 14:36:002022-02-10 10:44:03SEC CHARGES ATTORNEY WITH USING BOARD ACCESS TO ENGAGE IN INSIDER TRADING
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
Jeff Peterson

SEC REFILES FRAUD COMPLAINT AGAINST TEXAS AG

October 24, 2016/in News, Securities Law /by Jeff Peterson

The SEC refiled federal fraud charges against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, after the agency’s initial civil complaint was dismissed by a judge for lack of sufficient evidentiary allegations.

The amended complaint alleges Paxton knowingly defrauded an investment group he was involved with by violating an agreement that no member would pitch investment in a company if they were receiving any benefit that was not being provided to the other members of the investment group. Specifically, the SEC alleges that Paxton recommended the group invest in startup Servergy Inc. while that company was paying him a commission, a fact that was not disclosed to the group.

The amended complaint additionally alleged that Paxton did not properly disclose his commission on his taxes. Paxton’s attorneys released a statement that they were “disappointed” in the SEC’s decision to refile the case. The judge ordered the initial dismissal because the allegations did not establish any affirmative duty on Paxton’s part to inform potential investors that he stood to profit from any investment.

The case is number 4:16-cv-00246 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Jeff Petersen is an attorney licensed in California and Illinois representing clients in a wide variety of SEC investigations and SEC enforcement actions. He can be reached in California at 858.792.3666 and in Illinois at 312.450.4584.

https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/iStock-1226290983-scaled.jpg 1684 2560 Jeff Peterson https://lawofficesjtp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JTPlogo-01.png Jeff Peterson2016-10-24 08:45:002022-02-10 10:44:03SEC REFILES FRAUD COMPLAINT AGAINST TEXAS AG
Page 1 of 212
JTP Brandmark

Categories

  • Corporate Transactional Law
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • News
  • Personal
  • Securities Law

M&A Articles

  • Charging Bull sculpture in New York CityM&A trends for 2022December 22, 2021 - 2:47 pm
  • M&A AGREEMENTSSANDBAGGING CLAUSES IN M&A AGREEMENTSNovember 10, 2021 - 3:22 pm
  • Law services in Chicago and San Diego - A lawyer's hand, pen and overlayDEFINING A SELLER’S KNOWLEDGE IN AN M&A AGREEMENTOctober 24, 2020 - 5:19 am

Corporate Transactional Law Articles

  • DEI for legal teamsDEI for legal teamsJanuary 11, 2022 - 12:21 pm
  • Closing a business in CAHow to Close a Business in CaliforniaNovember 22, 2021 - 2:36 pm
  • Law Offices of Jeff Peterson at workAN OVERVIEW OF SEC REVISIONS TO FORM ADV AND RECORD-KEEPING RULENovember 9, 2021 - 1:43 pm

Securities Law Articles

  • Chinese companies are delisting off the N.Y.S.E.Chinese Companies Delisting off the NYSEJanuary 4, 2022 - 2:54 pm
  • Words insider trading written on a book.SEC CHARGES CHINESE NATIONAL CITIZENS WITH INSIDER TRADING, OBTAINS ORDER FREEZING $29 MILLION IN U.S. ACCOUNTSFebruary 13, 2017 - 12:11 pm
  • Texas Attorney General Ken PaxtonSEC REFILES FRAUD COMPLAINT AGAINST TEXAS AGOctober 24, 2016 - 8:45 am

LINKS

Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
FAQs

SAN DIEGO

12526 High Bluff Dr.,
Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130

Phone: 858.792.3666
Fax: 858.792.3667

CHICAGO

444 West Lake Street, 17th Fl.,
Chicago, IL 60606

Phone: 312.583.7488
Fax: 312.548.7480

CONNECT

USERWAY

Small UserWay Logo

Disclaimer: The information on this website is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained on this site should be construed as legal advice from The Law Offices of Jeffrey T. Petersen or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this content should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this website without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.

© The Law Offices of Jeffrey T. Petersen 2022

site design by digitalstoryteller.io

© The Law Offices of Jeffrey T. Petersen 2022

site design by digitalstoryteller.io

Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Accept settings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only